<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1985 (7) TMI 349 - CEGAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167444</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Collector (Appeals)&#039; decision, confirming the reliance on the R.G. 1 register data for production calculation under Notification No. 132/82. The respondents were granted the full rebate amount claimed, and the Department&#039;s appeal was dismissed. The Tribunal criticized the improper stay directive in the Order-in-Appeal, emphasizing the lack of legal authority for such action.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 Jul 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Dec 2014 11:23:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=371654" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1985 (7) TMI 349 - CEGAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167444</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Collector (Appeals)&#039; decision, confirming the reliance on the R.G. 1 register data for production calculation under Notification No. 132/82. The respondents were granted the full rebate amount claimed, and the Department&#039;s appeal was dismissed. The Tribunal criticized the improper stay directive in the Order-in-Appeal, emphasizing the lack of legal authority for such action.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Jul 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167444</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>