<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (12) TMI 749 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254406</link>
    <description>In a dispute concerning alleged service tax liability, the HC considered whether anticipatory bail was warranted and whether the petitioners had included and collected service tax in the contract costing. The application was disposed of without granting anticipatory bail, and the investigation was left to proceed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2015 11:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=371635" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (12) TMI 749 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254406</link>
      <description>In a dispute concerning alleged service tax liability, the HC considered whether anticipatory bail was warranted and whether the petitioners had included and collected service tax in the contract costing. The application was disposed of without granting anticipatory bail, and the investigation was left to proceed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254406</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>