https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254405 The Tribunal rejected the appeal against the Order-in-Appeal upholding the Order-in-Original confirming Service Tax demand, interest, and penalties. The appellants, a security organization, failed to prove their claim of being a proprietary firm not liable to service tax. Evidence showed their awareness of service tax liability, including registration of another security agency. Despite citing judgments requiring positive evidence for suppression, the Tribunal found the appellants deliberately evaded service tax. The decision emphasizes compliance with tax obligations in commercial activities, dismissing the appeal due to the appellants' awareness and evasion of service tax. en-us Thu, 28 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 14 Oct 2015 15:21:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254405 The Tribunal rejected the appeal against the Order-in-Appeal upholding the Order-in-Original confirming Service Tax demand, interest, and penalties. The appellants, a security organization, failed to prove their claim of being a proprietary firm not liable to service tax. Evidence showed their awareness of service tax liability, including registration of another security agency. Despite citing judgments requiring positive evidence for suppression, the Tribunal found the appellants deliberately evaded service tax. The decision emphasizes compliance with tax obligations in commercial activities, dismissing the appeal due to the appellants' awareness and evasion of service tax. Case-Laws Service Tax Thu, 28 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254405