https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254404 The appeal was dismissed by the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT CHENNAI as time-barred due to the non-receipt of the adjudication order by the appellant. Despite the appellant's claim of office relocation and non-receipt of the order, evidence showed delivery to the address mentioned in the order. The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals) decision, citing the Customs Act, 1962 provisions on serving orders. The appeal was deemed time-barred, and the stay application was disposed of accordingly. en-us Wed, 27 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 30 Jun 2015 15:37:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254404 The appeal was dismissed by the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT CHENNAI as time-barred due to the non-receipt of the adjudication order by the appellant. Despite the appellant's claim of office relocation and non-receipt of the order, evidence showed delivery to the address mentioned in the order. The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals) decision, citing the Customs Act, 1962 provisions on serving orders. The appeal was deemed time-barred, and the stay application was disposed of accordingly. Case-Laws Service Tax Wed, 27 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254404