<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (12) TMI 746 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254403</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the penalties imposed on the appellant, a small service provider, under Section 78 of the Finance Act, 1994, as the tax liability was discharged before the issuance of the show cause notice. The appellant&#039;s plea for penalty waiver under Section 80 was accepted, emphasizing fairness in penalty imposition for small service providers unaware of tax regulations. The appeal was allowed, providing relief to the appellant in this case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Dec 2014 10:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=371631" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (12) TMI 746 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254403</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the penalties imposed on the appellant, a small service provider, under Section 78 of the Finance Act, 1994, as the tax liability was discharged before the issuance of the show cause notice. The appellant&#039;s plea for penalty waiver under Section 80 was accepted, emphasizing fairness in penalty imposition for small service providers unaware of tax regulations. The appeal was allowed, providing relief to the appellant in this case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254403</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>