<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (12) TMI 739 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254396</link>
    <description>The Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision in appeals under Section 35-G of the Central Excise Act, determining duty liability based on Notification No.4/2000-CE(NT). The appellant&#039;s liability was restricted to Rs. 300/- per Metric Tonne for products manufactured in August 1997, with the penalty deleted due to no intent to evade duty. The Court confirmed the duty recovery and penalty deletion, dismissing the Civil Miscellaneous Appeals without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2015 10:42:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=371621" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (12) TMI 739 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254396</link>
      <description>The Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision in appeals under Section 35-G of the Central Excise Act, determining duty liability based on Notification No.4/2000-CE(NT). The appellant&#039;s liability was restricted to Rs. 300/- per Metric Tonne for products manufactured in August 1997, with the penalty deleted due to no intent to evade duty. The Court confirmed the duty recovery and penalty deletion, dismissing the Civil Miscellaneous Appeals without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254396</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>