https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254389 The High Court upheld the Tribunal's decision to dismiss the appeal due to a significant delay of 580 days in filing. Despite the petitioner's claim of relying on legal consultants and lack of legal knowledge, the Court found the explanation inadequate. Merely instructing the advocate without ensuring proper authorization does not excuse the delay. The Court emphasized that ignorance of legal technicalities does not justify inaction. As a result, the petition was dismissed, with the Court stating no basis for intervention in writ jurisdiction. en-us Tue, 18 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 20 Dec 2014 09:35:05 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254389 The High Court upheld the Tribunal's decision to dismiss the appeal due to a significant delay of 580 days in filing. Despite the petitioner's claim of relying on legal consultants and lack of legal knowledge, the Court found the explanation inadequate. Merely instructing the advocate without ensuring proper authorization does not excuse the delay. The Court emphasized that ignorance of legal technicalities does not justify inaction. As a result, the petition was dismissed, with the Court stating no basis for intervention in writ jurisdiction. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 18 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254389