<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (12) TMI 711 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254368</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT KOLKATA dismissed the Miscellaneous Applications for condonation of delay, Stay Petition, and Appeal due to the Appellant&#039;s failure to establish the bonafideness of the reasons for the delay in filing the appeal. The Tribunal highlighted the importance of demonstrating bonafideness in such cases and emphasized the need for providing adequate details and evidence to support reasons for delay. The lack of disclosure regarding the staff member involved in the accident led to doubts about the credibility of the reasons presented, resulting in the dismissal of the Appellant&#039;s applications and subsequent petitions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2015 14:31:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=371563" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (12) TMI 711 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254368</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT KOLKATA dismissed the Miscellaneous Applications for condonation of delay, Stay Petition, and Appeal due to the Appellant&#039;s failure to establish the bonafideness of the reasons for the delay in filing the appeal. The Tribunal highlighted the importance of demonstrating bonafideness in such cases and emphasized the need for providing adequate details and evidence to support reasons for delay. The lack of disclosure regarding the staff member involved in the accident led to doubts about the credibility of the reasons presented, resulting in the dismissal of the Appellant&#039;s applications and subsequent petitions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254368</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>