https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254355 The High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the Deputy Commissioner's classification order of Nizral Shampoo for excise duty. The court upheld the respondent's classification under sub-heading No.3305.00, rejecting the petitioner's argument for classification as a medicament under sub-heading No.3303.10. Emphasizing technical expertise in classification matters, the court found the impugned order consistent with legal provisions and previous judgments. The court deemed the writ petition not maintainable due to alternative remedies available under the Central Excise Act, ultimately denying the petition and disposing of the miscellaneous petition without costs. en-us Tue, 21 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 19 Dec 2014 16:45:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254355 The High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the Deputy Commissioner's classification order of Nizral Shampoo for excise duty. The court upheld the respondent's classification under sub-heading No.3305.00, rejecting the petitioner's argument for classification as a medicament under sub-heading No.3303.10. Emphasizing technical expertise in classification matters, the court found the impugned order consistent with legal provisions and previous judgments. The court deemed the writ petition not maintainable due to alternative remedies available under the Central Excise Act, ultimately denying the petition and disposing of the miscellaneous petition without costs. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 21 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254355