<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1985 (6) TMI 182 - CEGAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167428</link>
    <description>The appeal was rejected, affirming that prilling of ammonium nitrate does not constitute &quot;manufacture&quot; and prilled ammonium nitrate is not liable to be charged to duty under Item 68 of the Central Excise Tariff Schedule when it has already suffered duty under the same item.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Jun 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2014 14:31:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=371529" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1985 (6) TMI 182 - CEGAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167428</link>
      <description>The appeal was rejected, affirming that prilling of ammonium nitrate does not constitute &quot;manufacture&quot; and prilled ammonium nitrate is not liable to be charged to duty under Item 68 of the Central Excise Tariff Schedule when it has already suffered duty under the same item.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Jun 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167428</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>