<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1985 (3) TMI 281 - CEGAT CALCUTTA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167425</link>
    <description>Non-maintenance of the mandatory G.S. 13 Register under the Gold (Control) Act, 1968 can support seizure, confiscation and penalty where non-entry of gold ornaments is admitted and no evidence substantiates the claimed transactions. A private notebook does not replace the statutory register, and a minor discrepancy in a show-cause notice does not invalidate proceedings. A voluntary statement does not attract protection against compelled self-incrimination. Penalty and redemption fine must nevertheless remain proportionate to the contravention; personal circumstances and the severity of the breach may justify reduction of monetary sanctions while sustaining confiscation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Mar 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2014 13:19:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=371526" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1985 (3) TMI 281 - CEGAT CALCUTTA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167425</link>
      <description>Non-maintenance of the mandatory G.S. 13 Register under the Gold (Control) Act, 1968 can support seizure, confiscation and penalty where non-entry of gold ornaments is admitted and no evidence substantiates the claimed transactions. A private notebook does not replace the statutory register, and a minor discrepancy in a show-cause notice does not invalidate proceedings. A voluntary statement does not attract protection against compelled self-incrimination. Penalty and redemption fine must nevertheless remain proportionate to the contravention; personal circumstances and the severity of the breach may justify reduction of monetary sanctions while sustaining confiscation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Mar 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167425</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>