<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1984 (11) TMI 337 - CEGAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167395</link>
    <description>A transitional saving provision preserved pending revision proceedings initiated under the earlier regime, so the Board could continue and complete them despite substitution of the revision section. For tariff classification, the essential character and commercial identity of hub-bolts governed; special manufacture to specification, limited automobile use, or market context did not displace their basic nature as bolts. On that reasoning, Item 52 applied rather than Item 34A, and the claimed exemption under Notification No. 99/71-C.E. was unavailable. The text thus affirms continued jurisdiction under the saving clause and a classification approach based on the ordinary function of fasteners.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2014 14:35:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=371452" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1984 (11) TMI 337 - CEGAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167395</link>
      <description>A transitional saving provision preserved pending revision proceedings initiated under the earlier regime, so the Board could continue and complete them despite substitution of the revision section. For tariff classification, the essential character and commercial identity of hub-bolts governed; special manufacture to specification, limited automobile use, or market context did not displace their basic nature as bolts. On that reasoning, Item 52 applied rather than Item 34A, and the claimed exemption under Notification No. 99/71-C.E. was unavailable. The text thus affirms continued jurisdiction under the saving clause and a classification approach based on the ordinary function of fasteners.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167395</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>