<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1985 (4) TMI 294 - CEGAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167392</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, overturning the Assistant Collector&#039;s withdrawal of the concession under Notification No. 120/75-C.E. The Tribunal held that the distributors were not related persons as per the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944, and there was no evidence of influenced invoiced prices due to any relationship with distributors. Therefore, the appellants were deemed entitled to the concession, and the impugned orders were set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Apr 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2014 14:23:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=371449" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1985 (4) TMI 294 - CEGAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167392</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, overturning the Assistant Collector&#039;s withdrawal of the concession under Notification No. 120/75-C.E. The Tribunal held that the distributors were not related persons as per the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944, and there was no evidence of influenced invoiced prices due to any relationship with distributors. Therefore, the appellants were deemed entitled to the concession, and the impugned orders were set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Apr 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167392</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>