<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1985 (5) TMI 222 - CEGAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167391</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the application for condonation of delay in filing an appeal by the Collector of Central Excise against an order, citing administrative reasons for the delay. Emphasizing the need for a clear explanation for each day of delay, the Tribunal found the reasons provided unsatisfactory and referred to previous rulings. It concluded that there was no sufficient cause for the delay, leading to the dismissal of the Stay application and the appeal itself under Section 35-B(5) of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 May 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2014 14:02:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=371448" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1985 (5) TMI 222 - CEGAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167391</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the application for condonation of delay in filing an appeal by the Collector of Central Excise against an order, citing administrative reasons for the delay. Emphasizing the need for a clear explanation for each day of delay, the Tribunal found the reasons provided unsatisfactory and referred to previous rulings. It concluded that there was no sufficient cause for the delay, leading to the dismissal of the Stay application and the appeal itself under Section 35-B(5) of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 May 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167391</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>