<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1985 (4) TMI 293 - CEGAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167390</link>
    <description>The Tribunal rejected the appellant&#039;s application under Section 129E of the Customs Act, 1962, seeking a stay of the penalty deposit pending appeal. Emphasizing that undue hardship should be financial in nature and not based on the strength of the case, the Tribunal dismissed the application, stating that the appeal would proceed for disposal if the deposits were not made within the given timeframe.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Apr 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2014 13:12:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=371447" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1985 (4) TMI 293 - CEGAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167390</link>
      <description>The Tribunal rejected the appellant&#039;s application under Section 129E of the Customs Act, 1962, seeking a stay of the penalty deposit pending appeal. Emphasizing that undue hardship should be financial in nature and not based on the strength of the case, the Tribunal dismissed the application, stating that the appeal would proceed for disposal if the deposits were not made within the given timeframe.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Apr 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167390</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>