<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (12) TMI 667 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254324</link>
    <description>The Tribunal, in a case concerning service tax liability on sponsoring a cricket team, ruled in favor of the appellant. The Tribunal held that sponsoring a cricket team did not constitute a separate taxable service, as the tax for the transaction had already been paid under a different category. The impugned order confirming tax liability was set aside, granting consequential relief to the appellant. The decision was based on the finding that the appellant was not liable for additional service tax on sponsoring the cricket team.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2015 13:03:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=371423" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (12) TMI 667 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254324</link>
      <description>The Tribunal, in a case concerning service tax liability on sponsoring a cricket team, ruled in favor of the appellant. The Tribunal held that sponsoring a cricket team did not constitute a separate taxable service, as the tax for the transaction had already been paid under a different category. The impugned order confirming tax liability was set aside, granting consequential relief to the appellant. The decision was based on the finding that the appellant was not liable for additional service tax on sponsoring the cricket team.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254324</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>