<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (12) TMI 657 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254314</link>
    <description>Aluminium dross and skimmings were held not to qualify as manufactured excisable goods because they are refuse/byproducts, not the result of a skilful transformation into a new and different article. The court reasoned that mere ability to fetch a sale price does not satisfy the marketability or manufacture tests; saleability alone does not establish production by manufacture in India. The decision applied the principle that excise is an incidence of manufacture and that goods must undergo transformation to attract duty, and relied on the requirement that definition and manufacture tests be satisfied conjunctively. Appeal allowed for the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2026 13:00:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=371413" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (12) TMI 657 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254314</link>
      <description>Aluminium dross and skimmings were held not to qualify as manufactured excisable goods because they are refuse/byproducts, not the result of a skilful transformation into a new and different article. The court reasoned that mere ability to fetch a sale price does not satisfy the marketability or manufacture tests; saleability alone does not establish production by manufacture in India. The decision applied the principle that excise is an incidence of manufacture and that goods must undergo transformation to attract duty, and relied on the requirement that definition and manufacture tests be satisfied conjunctively. Appeal allowed for the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254314</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>