<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (12) TMI 644 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254301</link>
    <description>The Civil Miscellaneous Appeal challenging Final Order No. 700 of 2009 by CESTAT was dismissed by the Court, upholding the Tribunal&#039;s decision regarding the interpretation of customs duty exemption notifications. The Court rejected the appellant&#039;s arguments on the validity of the Final Order, emphasizing the need for timely challenges under the Customs Act, 1962. The Court also affirmed the Tribunal&#039;s jurisdiction, highlighting the Department&#039;s obligation to seek amendments or file appeals within the prescribed period. Consequently, the Final Order was upheld, and the connected Miscellaneous petition was rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2014 15:20:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=371399" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (12) TMI 644 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254301</link>
      <description>The Civil Miscellaneous Appeal challenging Final Order No. 700 of 2009 by CESTAT was dismissed by the Court, upholding the Tribunal&#039;s decision regarding the interpretation of customs duty exemption notifications. The Court rejected the appellant&#039;s arguments on the validity of the Final Order, emphasizing the need for timely challenges under the Customs Act, 1962. The Court also affirmed the Tribunal&#039;s jurisdiction, highlighting the Department&#039;s obligation to seek amendments or file appeals within the prescribed period. Consequently, the Final Order was upheld, and the connected Miscellaneous petition was rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254301</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>