<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1985 (2) TMI 284 - CEGAT CALCUTTA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167379</link>
    <description>The Tribunal remanded the case to the Additional Collector of Customs, Calcutta, for de novo adjudication, directing reweighment of the jewelry in the presence of the appellant or his representative and allowing the appellant to produce any other evidence. The Tribunal did not delve into the merits and other legal issues due to the remand for re-adjudication.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2014 11:24:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=371385" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1985 (2) TMI 284 - CEGAT CALCUTTA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167379</link>
      <description>The Tribunal remanded the case to the Additional Collector of Customs, Calcutta, for de novo adjudication, directing reweighment of the jewelry in the presence of the appellant or his representative and allowing the appellant to produce any other evidence. The Tribunal did not delve into the merits and other legal issues due to the remand for re-adjudication.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167379</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>