<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1985 (5) TMI 218 - CEGAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167371</link>
    <description>Imported components used to make a VPS Stepless Spindle Speed Regulator were treated as a pulley mechanism, with classification determined by the article&#039;s own character rather than its intended use in ring spinning frames. Applying the interpretative rules, section notes and explanatory notes, goods that are themselves covered by a specific tariff heading remain classifiable there even if designed for a larger machine; the components were therefore classifiable under Heading 84.63. The exemption under Notification No. 350-Cus./76 was not available because the notification did not extend to these parts, a view reinforced by the later separate notification for such goods.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 May 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2014 16:49:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=371377" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1985 (5) TMI 218 - CEGAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167371</link>
      <description>Imported components used to make a VPS Stepless Spindle Speed Regulator were treated as a pulley mechanism, with classification determined by the article&#039;s own character rather than its intended use in ring spinning frames. Applying the interpretative rules, section notes and explanatory notes, goods that are themselves covered by a specific tariff heading remain classifiable there even if designed for a larger machine; the components were therefore classifiable under Heading 84.63. The exemption under Notification No. 350-Cus./76 was not available because the notification did not extend to these parts, a view reinforced by the later separate notification for such goods.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 May 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167371</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>