<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1985 (4) TMI 290 - CEGAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167368</link>
    <description>The Tribunal granted condonation of delay in filing the appeal before the Appellate Tribunal CEGAT NEW DELHI, considering the necessity of seeking expert opinion in light of previous decisions and the impact on customs practices and government revenue. The Tribunal balanced the principles of timely legal actions with the practicalities of governmental processes, ultimately deciding in favor of the Department&#039;s application for condonation of delay.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Apr 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2014 16:33:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=371374" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1985 (4) TMI 290 - CEGAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167368</link>
      <description>The Tribunal granted condonation of delay in filing the appeal before the Appellate Tribunal CEGAT NEW DELHI, considering the necessity of seeking expert opinion in light of previous decisions and the impact on customs practices and government revenue. The Tribunal balanced the principles of timely legal actions with the practicalities of governmental processes, ultimately deciding in favor of the Department&#039;s application for condonation of delay.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Apr 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167368</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>