https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167365 The appeal challenging an order by the Appellate Collector of Customs was dismissed due to delay in filing. The appellant's request for condonation of delay was rejected as the court found the reasons provided did not constitute sufficient cause. The judge emphasized that negligence, even if stemming from legal advice, cannot justify condonation of delay, highlighting the importance of adhering to limitation laws and considering the impact on the rights of all parties involved. en-us Wed, 27 Feb 1985 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 17 Dec 2014 15:04:06 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167365 The appeal challenging an order by the Appellate Collector of Customs was dismissed due to delay in filing. The appellant's request for condonation of delay was rejected as the court found the reasons provided did not constitute sufficient cause. The judge emphasized that negligence, even if stemming from legal advice, cannot justify condonation of delay, highlighting the importance of adhering to limitation laws and considering the impact on the rights of all parties involved. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 27 Feb 1985 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167365