<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1985 (5) TMI 216 - CEGAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167348</link>
    <description>A defective memorandum of appeal and stay application, if not signed by the company&#039;s principal officer, may still be cured by amendment where sufficient cause is shown and the filing was made with the company&#039;s knowledge and authority. The Tribunal treated the omission to sign and verify as a procedural defect rather than a fatal irregularity, relying on its power to permit amendment under the Tribunal (Procedure) Rules and by analogy with Order VI Rule 14 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The defect was therefore held curable, and the appellant was directed to obtain the principal officer&#039;s signature and regularise the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 May 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2014 11:54:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=371354" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1985 (5) TMI 216 - CEGAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167348</link>
      <description>A defective memorandum of appeal and stay application, if not signed by the company&#039;s principal officer, may still be cured by amendment where sufficient cause is shown and the filing was made with the company&#039;s knowledge and authority. The Tribunal treated the omission to sign and verify as a procedural defect rather than a fatal irregularity, relying on its power to permit amendment under the Tribunal (Procedure) Rules and by analogy with Order VI Rule 14 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The defect was therefore held curable, and the appellant was directed to obtain the principal officer&#039;s signature and regularise the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 May 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167348</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>