<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (12) TMI 635 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254292</link>
    <description>Proceedings for demand and levy of interest under Section 201 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 must be initiated within a reasonable period even though the provision prescribes no express limitation. The HC applied the statutory scheme and held that, like other time-bound actions under the Act, action for failure to deduct tax at source cannot be left open-ended. On the facts, a notice issued nearly seven years after the relevant assessment years was beyond a reasonable time, particularly where commercial and financial positions may change over time. The levy under Sections 201 and 201(1A) was therefore time-barred, and the Tribunal&#039;s view was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Sep 2022 14:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=371329" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (12) TMI 635 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254292</link>
      <description>Proceedings for demand and levy of interest under Section 201 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 must be initiated within a reasonable period even though the provision prescribes no express limitation. The HC applied the statutory scheme and held that, like other time-bound actions under the Act, action for failure to deduct tax at source cannot be left open-ended. On the facts, a notice issued nearly seven years after the relevant assessment years was beyond a reasonable time, particularly where commercial and financial positions may change over time. The levy under Sections 201 and 201(1A) was therefore time-barred, and the Tribunal&#039;s view was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254292</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>