<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (12) TMI 624 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254281</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai allowed the appeal, granting CENVAT credit to the appellant. Input credit was initially denied, but the Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, considering the activity as manufacturing. The decision, supported by a previous case and affirmed by the Bombay High Court, set aside the impugned order and allowed the appeal with consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2016 15:38:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=371298" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (12) TMI 624 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254281</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai allowed the appeal, granting CENVAT credit to the appellant. Input credit was initially denied, but the Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, considering the activity as manufacturing. The decision, supported by a previous case and affirmed by the Bombay High Court, set aside the impugned order and allowed the appeal with consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254281</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>