<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (12) TMI 611 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254268</link>
    <description>The High Court quashed the order rejecting the refund claim without a personal hearing, citing a breach of natural justice. The court directed the Deputy Commissioner of Customs to reconsider the application after granting the petitioner a hearing and allowing submission of necessary documents. Additionally, the court upheld the petitioner&#039;s eligibility for exemption under Customs Notification No. 21/2002, emphasizing compliance with Essentiality Certificate requirements. The rejection of the refund claim based on the re-export date and lack of original documents was reconsidered, with the court allowing the submission of photocopies for reevaluation due to challenges in obtaining original documents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2014 11:09:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=371270" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (12) TMI 611 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254268</link>
      <description>The High Court quashed the order rejecting the refund claim without a personal hearing, citing a breach of natural justice. The court directed the Deputy Commissioner of Customs to reconsider the application after granting the petitioner a hearing and allowing submission of necessary documents. Additionally, the court upheld the petitioner&#039;s eligibility for exemption under Customs Notification No. 21/2002, emphasizing compliance with Essentiality Certificate requirements. The rejection of the refund claim based on the re-export date and lack of original documents was reconsidered, with the court allowing the submission of photocopies for reevaluation due to challenges in obtaining original documents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254268</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>