<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (12) TMI 596 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254253</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, granting the Appellant cenvat credit on outdoor catering services. The Tribunal held that the services were used for business activities, not personal use by employees, in line with the definition of input service. Relying on precedents and circulars, the Tribunal found no evidence to counter the Appellant&#039;s claims, leading to the setting aside of the previous orders denying the credit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2015 15:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=371250" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (12) TMI 596 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254253</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, granting the Appellant cenvat credit on outdoor catering services. The Tribunal held that the services were used for business activities, not personal use by employees, in line with the definition of input service. Relying on precedents and circulars, the Tribunal found no evidence to counter the Appellant&#039;s claims, leading to the setting aside of the previous orders denying the credit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254253</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>