<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1985 (3) TMI 269 - CEGAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167341</link>
    <description>Notification No. 23/55 exempted specified minerals used as extenders, suspending agents, fillers or diluents, and its entry for chalk expressly included precipitated chalk. A prepared and surface-treated coated grade of precipitated calcium carbonate was analysed as a filler and as a technical form of precipitated chalk. The use of the word &quot;namely&quot; did not narrow the entry where the product still answered the description in the notification. Surface treatment to improve flow and processing characteristics did not change its essential character, so coated precipitated chalk fell within the exempted entry and qualified for the duty exemption.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Mar 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2014 16:19:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=371240" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1985 (3) TMI 269 - CEGAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167341</link>
      <description>Notification No. 23/55 exempted specified minerals used as extenders, suspending agents, fillers or diluents, and its entry for chalk expressly included precipitated chalk. A prepared and surface-treated coated grade of precipitated calcium carbonate was analysed as a filler and as a technical form of precipitated chalk. The use of the word &quot;namely&quot; did not narrow the entry where the product still answered the description in the notification. Surface treatment to improve flow and processing characteristics did not change its essential character, so coated precipitated chalk fell within the exempted entry and qualified for the duty exemption.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Mar 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167341</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>