<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1984 (12) TMI 305 - CEGAT BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167340</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, overturning the confiscation of gold bars and coins under the Customs Act. The appellant&#039;s true declaration and request for detention were found valid, entitling him to reclaim the gold for departure from India within two months. The judgment clarified the misinterpretation of &quot;bona fide baggage&quot; and affirmed the appellant&#039;s right to detain and reclaim the gold, resolving the confiscation issue in favor of the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Dec 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2014 16:16:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=371239" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1984 (12) TMI 305 - CEGAT BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167340</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, overturning the confiscation of gold bars and coins under the Customs Act. The appellant&#039;s true declaration and request for detention were found valid, entitling him to reclaim the gold for departure from India within two months. The judgment clarified the misinterpretation of &quot;bona fide baggage&quot; and affirmed the appellant&#039;s right to detain and reclaim the gold, resolving the confiscation issue in favor of the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Dec 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167340</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>