<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1984 (11) TMI 332 - CEGAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167334</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the demand of duty was time-barred and set it aside. The penalty imposition was also deemed unjustified and set aside based on the absence of necessary allegations and proof. The appeal was allowed in favor of the appellants.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Nov 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2014 14:52:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=371233" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1984 (11) TMI 332 - CEGAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167334</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the demand of duty was time-barred and set it aside. The penalty imposition was also deemed unjustified and set aside based on the absence of necessary allegations and proof. The appeal was allowed in favor of the appellants.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Nov 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167334</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>