<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1985 (1) TMI 319 - CEGAT MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167329</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the confiscation of the vessel &#039;m.v. Rosario&#039; under Section 115(1) of the Act but reduced the fine to &amp;amp;8377; 50,000. The owners and the Master successfully appealed against penalties imposed under Section 117, as the Tribunal found no specific rules requiring precautions by vessel owners. The decision differentiated between confiscation and penalties, ultimately ruling in favor of the appellants and providing relief by setting aside the penalties.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2014 14:33:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=371228" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1985 (1) TMI 319 - CEGAT MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167329</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the confiscation of the vessel &#039;m.v. Rosario&#039; under Section 115(1) of the Act but reduced the fine to &amp;amp;8377; 50,000. The owners and the Master successfully appealed against penalties imposed under Section 117, as the Tribunal found no specific rules requiring precautions by vessel owners. The decision differentiated between confiscation and penalties, ultimately ruling in favor of the appellants and providing relief by setting aside the penalties.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167329</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>