<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1985 (2) TMI 273 - CEGAT MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167319</link>
    <description>Duty-paid wrapper paper used to pack other varieties of paper was treated as eligible for the special movement procedure under Rule 56A(2) of the Central Excise Rules, 1944. The question of entitlement was answered in the affirmative by the Karnataka High Court, and the Tribunal then modified its earlier order accordingly. As a result, the assessee was held entitled to the Rule 56A(2) benefit and the Collector (Appeals)&#039; order was restored.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2014 11:22:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=371218" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1985 (2) TMI 273 - CEGAT MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167319</link>
      <description>Duty-paid wrapper paper used to pack other varieties of paper was treated as eligible for the special movement procedure under Rule 56A(2) of the Central Excise Rules, 1944. The question of entitlement was answered in the affirmative by the Karnataka High Court, and the Tribunal then modified its earlier order accordingly. As a result, the assessee was held entitled to the Rule 56A(2) benefit and the Collector (Appeals)&#039; order was restored.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167319</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>