<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (12) TMI 593 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254250</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the Revenue&#039;s application to change the respondent&#039;s name in the cause title. The Tribunal addressed the stay petition filed by the assessee and proceeded to hear the appeal. Regarding the taxability of ocean freight and related charges, the Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the previous order and remanding the matter for fresh consideration. The appeal was allowed by way of remand, and the stay application was disposed of.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2015 15:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=371197" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (12) TMI 593 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254250</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the Revenue&#039;s application to change the respondent&#039;s name in the cause title. The Tribunal addressed the stay petition filed by the assessee and proceeded to hear the appeal. Regarding the taxability of ocean freight and related charges, the Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the previous order and remanding the matter for fresh consideration. The appeal was allowed by way of remand, and the stay application was disposed of.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254250</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>