<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (12) TMI 590 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254247</link>
    <description>The appellate tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, a service provider in the commercial training sector, in a case challenging penalties imposed for short payment of service tax. The tribunal found the premature detection of the short payment before filing returns was unjust, considering the appellant&#039;s explanation of incomplete data entry and intent to reconcile figures. As there was no evidence of tax evasion and reconciliation would have occurred during return filing, the tribunal set aside the penalties, confirming only the demand and interest.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2014 15:35:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=371194" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (12) TMI 590 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254247</link>
      <description>The appellate tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, a service provider in the commercial training sector, in a case challenging penalties imposed for short payment of service tax. The tribunal found the premature detection of the short payment before filing returns was unjust, considering the appellant&#039;s explanation of incomplete data entry and intent to reconcile figures. As there was no evidence of tax evasion and reconciliation would have occurred during return filing, the tribunal set aside the penalties, confirming only the demand and interest.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254247</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>