https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254237 The appeal before the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT MUMBAI involved the dropping of penalty against the respondent for defaulting in paying duty under Rule 8(3A) of the Central Excise Rules, 2002. The Tribunal ruled that penalties under Rule 25 & 26 or under Section 11AC were not applicable, but imposed a penalty of &8377; 5000 under Rule 27. The respondent was directed to pay the penalty within 30 days. The appeal was disposed of with the imposition of the penalty under Rule 27, considering the specific circumstances and legal provisions of the case. en-us Wed, 12 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 17 Nov 2016 12:23:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254237 The appeal before the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT MUMBAI involved the dropping of penalty against the respondent for defaulting in paying duty under Rule 8(3A) of the Central Excise Rules, 2002. The Tribunal ruled that penalties under Rule 25 & 26 or under Section 11AC were not applicable, but imposed a penalty of &8377; 5000 under Rule 27. The respondent was directed to pay the penalty within 30 days. The appeal was disposed of with the imposition of the penalty under Rule 27, considering the specific circumstances and legal provisions of the case. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 12 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254237