<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (12) TMI 574 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254231</link>
    <description>The petitioner imported goods with a disputed value, leading to duty charges, a redemption fine, and penalty. The department&#039;s appeal was rejected as time-barred. Despite willingness to pay, the goods were detained. Attempts to expedite the appeal process were unsuccessful. The court directed the appellate tribunal to decide on the appeal within 30 days, emphasizing the prolonged detention of the goods. An urgent certified copy of the order was to be provided upon request.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2014 10:55:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=371170" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (12) TMI 574 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254231</link>
      <description>The petitioner imported goods with a disputed value, leading to duty charges, a redemption fine, and penalty. The department&#039;s appeal was rejected as time-barred. Despite willingness to pay, the goods were detained. Attempts to expedite the appeal process were unsuccessful. The court directed the appellate tribunal to decide on the appeal within 30 days, emphasizing the prolonged detention of the goods. An urgent certified copy of the order was to be provided upon request.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254231</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>