<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (12) TMI 558 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254215</link>
    <description>Deductibility and tax treatment were addressed across several banking-related issues: interest paid to head office or overseas branches was allowed as a deduction where corresponding interest was taxed; profit on revaluation of unmatured forward forex contracts was treated as taxable income; section 14A disallowance was not sustained once the related interest income formed part of total income; provision for non-performing assets was held not deductible as a provision; netting of interest under section 244A against interest under section 220(2) was permitted; and section 115JB was held inapplicable to a banking company for the relevant year. The penalty under section 271(1)(c) also failed after the underlying quantum addition was deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2026 15:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=371141" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (12) TMI 558 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254215</link>
      <description>Deductibility and tax treatment were addressed across several banking-related issues: interest paid to head office or overseas branches was allowed as a deduction where corresponding interest was taxed; profit on revaluation of unmatured forward forex contracts was treated as taxable income; section 14A disallowance was not sustained once the related interest income formed part of total income; provision for non-performing assets was held not deductible as a provision; netting of interest under section 244A against interest under section 220(2) was permitted; and section 115JB was held inapplicable to a banking company for the relevant year. The penalty under section 271(1)(c) also failed after the underlying quantum addition was deleted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254215</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>