<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (12) TMI 552 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254209</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, allowing the set off of brought forward speculation losses against current year income and deleting the addition made under section 68 of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal emphasized the need for providing sufficient details and evidence to support claims, highlighting that additions cannot be made solely based on suspicions. The appeal filed by the revenue was ultimately dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2014 06:28:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=371135" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (12) TMI 552 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254209</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, allowing the set off of brought forward speculation losses against current year income and deleting the addition made under section 68 of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal emphasized the need for providing sufficient details and evidence to support claims, highlighting that additions cannot be made solely based on suspicions. The appeal filed by the revenue was ultimately dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254209</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>