<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1984 (8) TMI 348 - CEGAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167305</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the rate of duty should be determined based on the date of removal from the warehouse as per Section 15(1)(b) of the Customs Act. Consequently, the Tribunal set aside the impugned order passed by the Collector of Customs (Appeals), Bombay, and accepted all four appeals, affirming the Customs authorities&#039; imposition of c.v. duty based on the date of removal from the warehouse.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2014 15:43:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=371110" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1984 (8) TMI 348 - CEGAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167305</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the rate of duty should be determined based on the date of removal from the warehouse as per Section 15(1)(b) of the Customs Act. Consequently, the Tribunal set aside the impugned order passed by the Collector of Customs (Appeals), Bombay, and accepted all four appeals, affirming the Customs authorities&#039; imposition of c.v. duty based on the date of removal from the warehouse.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167305</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>