<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1984 (8) TMI 346 - CEGAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167303</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the value of packing for china and porcelain goods must be included in the assessable value as per Section 4(4)(d)(i) of the Act. The decision overturned the Collector (Appeals) order, stating the Appellant is entitled to consequential relief. The ruling clarified that the inclusion of packing cost is mandatory for goods ordinarily sold in wholesale trade in a packed condition, even if some sales are made without such packing upon request.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 25 Aug 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2014 15:27:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=371108" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1984 (8) TMI 346 - CEGAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167303</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the value of packing for china and porcelain goods must be included in the assessable value as per Section 4(4)(d)(i) of the Act. The decision overturned the Collector (Appeals) order, stating the Appellant is entitled to consequential relief. The ruling clarified that the inclusion of packing cost is mandatory for goods ordinarily sold in wholesale trade in a packed condition, even if some sales are made without such packing upon request.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 25 Aug 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167303</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>