<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (8) TMI 1037 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254208</link>
    <description>Pumping charges collected for delivering ready mix concrete to the customer&#039;s specified place were treated as part of the sale price and taxable turnover under the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003. The court relied on the statutory turnover definition, which includes sums charged for anything done by the dealer in respect of goods sold at or before delivery. As the concrete had to be transported in workable condition and pumping merely enabled delivery to the chosen site, the activity was not an independent post-sale service. The charges were therefore includable in taxable turnover, and the assessee&#039;s challenge failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2014 16:48:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=371096" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (8) TMI 1037 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254208</link>
      <description>Pumping charges collected for delivering ready mix concrete to the customer&#039;s specified place were treated as part of the sale price and taxable turnover under the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003. The court relied on the statutory turnover definition, which includes sums charged for anything done by the dealer in respect of goods sold at or before delivery. As the concrete had to be transported in workable condition and pumping merely enabled delivery to the chosen site, the activity was not an independent post-sale service. The charges were therefore includable in taxable turnover, and the assessee&#039;s challenge failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254208</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>