<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (12) TMI 551 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254207</link>
    <description>HC analyzed three key issues: (1) Tribunal&#039;s refusal to remand proceedings for expense deduction, (2) tax refund interest treatment, and (3) securities classification. After comprehensive review, HC found no substantial legal questions in the Assessee Bank&#039;s appeal. The Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decisions on expense deductions, interest calculations, and securities classification. Consequently, HC dismissed the appeal without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2025 14:07:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=371089" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (12) TMI 551 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254207</link>
      <description>HC analyzed three key issues: (1) Tribunal&#039;s refusal to remand proceedings for expense deduction, (2) tax refund interest treatment, and (3) securities classification. After comprehensive review, HC found no substantial legal questions in the Assessee Bank&#039;s appeal. The Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decisions on expense deductions, interest calculations, and securities classification. Consequently, HC dismissed the appeal without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254207</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>