<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1984 (9) TMI 290 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167290</link>
    <description>Pharmaceutical grade polyvinyl pyrrolidone was treated as a synthetic resin for tariff purposes because it was a synthetic polymer within the polyvinyl resin class, and its water-soluble, pharmaceutical use did not alter its essential character. The court held that end-use was irrelevant where the tariff entry did not refer to use. It also rejected classification as a drug, because the tariff meaning of &quot;drug&quot; was not controlled by the Drugs and Cosmetics Act and the material was physiologically inert, serving only as a tablet binding agent. As it fell within Tariff Item 82(3), the residuary entry was unavailable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2014 12:09:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=371085" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1984 (9) TMI 290 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167290</link>
      <description>Pharmaceutical grade polyvinyl pyrrolidone was treated as a synthetic resin for tariff purposes because it was a synthetic polymer within the polyvinyl resin class, and its water-soluble, pharmaceutical use did not alter its essential character. The court held that end-use was irrelevant where the tariff entry did not refer to use. It also rejected classification as a drug, because the tariff meaning of &quot;drug&quot; was not controlled by the Drugs and Cosmetics Act and the material was physiologically inert, serving only as a tablet binding agent. As it fell within Tariff Item 82(3), the residuary entry was unavailable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167290</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>