<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1984 (12) TMI 300 - CEGAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167286</link>
    <description>An exemption notification must be strictly construed by its plain language, and where the nil-rate limit is attached to a factory, clearances by successive manufacturers from that factory must be clubbed for the year. Trade notices and clarifications cannot override the notification&#039;s express terms. Notification No. 305/77-C.E. operated on its own conditions for manufacture on another person&#039;s account and did not displace the limit under Notification No. 71/78-C.E. Because the factory had already exhausted the prescribed nil-rate clearance limit through earlier removals, the later clearances were not entitled to independent exemption, including for a loan licensee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2014 11:28:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=371080" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1984 (12) TMI 300 - CEGAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167286</link>
      <description>An exemption notification must be strictly construed by its plain language, and where the nil-rate limit is attached to a factory, clearances by successive manufacturers from that factory must be clubbed for the year. Trade notices and clarifications cannot override the notification&#039;s express terms. Notification No. 305/77-C.E. operated on its own conditions for manufacture on another person&#039;s account and did not displace the limit under Notification No. 71/78-C.E. Because the factory had already exhausted the prescribed nil-rate clearance limit through earlier removals, the later clearances were not entitled to independent exemption, including for a loan licensee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167286</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>