<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1985 (3) TMI 266 - CEGAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167273</link>
    <description>Excise duty is attracted by manufacture, with collection linked to removal under Rule 9 of the Central Excise Rules. Yarn manufactured and cleared while the exemption notifications were in force could not be subjected to duty merely because the cotton fabrics made from it were produced later after those notifications had ceased to operate. A later notification could not retrospectively impose duty on goods already manufactured and removed, as that would defeat the exemption already enjoyed and conflict with the basic nature of excise levy. The duty demand on the yarn was therefore not sustainable, and refund followed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Mar 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Dec 2014 13:19:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=371067" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1985 (3) TMI 266 - CEGAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167273</link>
      <description>Excise duty is attracted by manufacture, with collection linked to removal under Rule 9 of the Central Excise Rules. Yarn manufactured and cleared while the exemption notifications were in force could not be subjected to duty merely because the cotton fabrics made from it were produced later after those notifications had ceased to operate. A later notification could not retrospectively impose duty on goods already manufactured and removed, as that would defeat the exemption already enjoyed and conflict with the basic nature of excise levy. The duty demand on the yarn was therefore not sustainable, and refund followed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Mar 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167273</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>