<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (12) TMI 548 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254204</link>
    <description>The Tribunal determined that the Concession Agreement between the Port Department of Govt. of Puducherry and M/s. Karaikal Port Pvt. Ltd. should be classified as a Lease Agreement, not a Business Support Service, leading to a tax demand of Rs. 1,03,82,431. The Tribunal directed the applicant to make a pre-deposit of Rs. 10,00,000 within six weeks to stay the recovery of the balance dues pending appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2014 09:08:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=371058" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (12) TMI 548 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254204</link>
      <description>The Tribunal determined that the Concession Agreement between the Port Department of Govt. of Puducherry and M/s. Karaikal Port Pvt. Ltd. should be classified as a Lease Agreement, not a Business Support Service, leading to a tax demand of Rs. 1,03,82,431. The Tribunal directed the applicant to make a pre-deposit of Rs. 10,00,000 within six weeks to stay the recovery of the balance dues pending appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254204</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>