<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (12) TMI 544 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254200</link>
    <description>Renting an auditorium for cultural performances falls within Mandap Keeper Service because the statutory concept of a mandap covers immovable property let out for an official, social or business function, and cultural events such as drama and entertainment are treated as social functions. Service tax liability on that activity was therefore upheld. However, for a statutory or government body, the record did not show mala fide intent to evade tax, so the extended period of limitation was not available. The demand was confined to the normal period, interest remained payable on the recomputed demand, and penalties were set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2014 08:40:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=371054" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (12) TMI 544 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254200</link>
      <description>Renting an auditorium for cultural performances falls within Mandap Keeper Service because the statutory concept of a mandap covers immovable property let out for an official, social or business function, and cultural events such as drama and entertainment are treated as social functions. Service tax liability on that activity was therefore upheld. However, for a statutory or government body, the record did not show mala fide intent to evade tax, so the extended period of limitation was not available. The demand was confined to the normal period, interest remained payable on the recomputed demand, and penalties were set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254200</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>