<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (12) TMI 541 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254197</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the Appellant, finding that no penalty should be imposed under Section 76 of the Finance Act, 1994, for the Appellant&#039;s failure to pay Service Tax on renting immovable property during ongoing litigation. The Tribunal considered the Appellant&#039;s reasonable cause for non-payment, the subsequent payment with interest, and the absence of evidence showing an intention to evade payment. Previous case laws and Section 80(2) supported the decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2014 08:36:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=371051" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (12) TMI 541 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254197</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the Appellant, finding that no penalty should be imposed under Section 76 of the Finance Act, 1994, for the Appellant&#039;s failure to pay Service Tax on renting immovable property during ongoing litigation. The Tribunal considered the Appellant&#039;s reasonable cause for non-payment, the subsequent payment with interest, and the absence of evidence showing an intention to evade payment. Previous case laws and Section 80(2) supported the decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254197</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>