<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (12) TMI 536 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254192</link>
    <description>The Tribunal granted relief to the appellant in the case concerning eligibility for CENVAT credit on duty paid for inputs used in setting up a factory and fabricating parts for a sponge iron plant. Despite initial rejection by authorities due to lack of detailed evidence, the Tribunal found merit in the appellant&#039;s claim, considering the chartered engineer certificate and plant/machinery photographs. The Tribunal allowed credit for certain items used in machinery fabrication but disallowed for others, with an assessment of approximately Rs. 5 lakhs as potentially inadmissible credit. The appellant was exempted from pre-deposit upon depositing the specified amount within a set timeframe, with a stay on recovery pending appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2014 07:12:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=371046" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (12) TMI 536 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254192</link>
      <description>The Tribunal granted relief to the appellant in the case concerning eligibility for CENVAT credit on duty paid for inputs used in setting up a factory and fabricating parts for a sponge iron plant. Despite initial rejection by authorities due to lack of detailed evidence, the Tribunal found merit in the appellant&#039;s claim, considering the chartered engineer certificate and plant/machinery photographs. The Tribunal allowed credit for certain items used in machinery fabrication but disallowed for others, with an assessment of approximately Rs. 5 lakhs as potentially inadmissible credit. The appellant was exempted from pre-deposit upon depositing the specified amount within a set timeframe, with a stay on recovery pending appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254192</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>