https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254189 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the respondent, rejecting the appellant's arguments regarding the inclusion of deemed exports for calculating clearances to DTA and exceeding the limit without a show-cause notice. It emphasized the responsibility of both parties in compliance and held that the extended period for duty demand was unjustified without intent to evade payment. The appeal by the Revenue was dismissed, underscoring the importance of adherence to prescribed limits and fair treatment in duty-related matters. en-us Fri, 14 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 15 Dec 2014 07:07:36 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254189 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the respondent, rejecting the appellant's arguments regarding the inclusion of deemed exports for calculating clearances to DTA and exceeding the limit without a show-cause notice. It emphasized the responsibility of both parties in compliance and held that the extended period for duty demand was unjustified without intent to evade payment. The appeal by the Revenue was dismissed, underscoring the importance of adherence to prescribed limits and fair treatment in duty-related matters. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 14 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254189